Skip to content
Timely filingCARCNot billable to patient

CO-166 denial code

Services submitted after the payer's responsibility for processing claims ended

The plan's claim-processing responsibility ended before submission.

How to fix it

Identify the payer responsible for the period and rebill.

How to prevent it

Verify plan termination dates, particularly for patients moving between plans mid-year.

The CO prefix marks this a contractual obligation. The balance is absorbed by the provider under the payer agreement and cannot be transferred to the patient.

In practice

A patient moved from one Medicare Advantage plan to another in January. A claim for a February service is submitted to the previous plan out of habit and returns CO-166.

The plan's responsibility for processing claims ended when the patient's enrolment did. It is not denying coverage so much as declining jurisdiction, which is a different thing and points somewhere else.

Identify the payer responsible for the service period and submit there. The filing deadline with the correct payer has been running from the date of service throughout, so this is worth doing quickly rather than appealing to the wrong plan.

What sits behind it

Enrolment transitions concentrate this denial into predictable windows. January is the largest as annual elections take effect, but Medicare Advantage special enrolment periods, Medicaid managed care reassignments and employer plan changes all produce mid-year transitions with the same effect.

The trap is that eligibility responses sometimes lag the transition, so a verification performed in early January can return the previous plan as active. Where a payer identity looks stale, checking the effective dates in the response rather than the active flag catches it.

Retroactive enrolment complicates it further, since a plan can be assigned responsibility for dates already past. Claims denied by one payer during that period frequently become payable by another once the retroactive assignment is visible, so these are worth rechecking rather than writing off.

Related codes

Terms used here — Eligibility Verification · Timely Filing · Coordination of Benefits

How we handle it — Eligibility Verification · AR Management · Denial Management

Primary sources

The rules behind CO-166, at the bodies that publish them.

Looking for a different code? Search all 190 CARC and RARC codes

Questions about CO-166

No. Timely filing means the claim came too late to the correct payer. This means the payer is not responsible for the period at all, so no appeal to that plan will succeed. The claim needs redirecting rather than defending.

Verify eligibility for the specific date of service rather than for today, and read the effective dates in the response rather than the active flag. Eligibility systems sometimes lag enrolment transitions, particularly in January.

Yes, and it is worth rechecking before writing off. A plan can be assigned responsibility for dates already past, and claims denied during that window frequently become payable by the newly responsible payer once the assignment appears in the eligibility record.

Find out what your denials are costing you

A free billing audit reviews your denial rate, AR aging and clean claim rate against industry benchmarks. Takes about two minutes to request. No sales pitch.

No setup fees · You pay when we collect · Pricing from 3% of net collections