Skip to content

Specialty billing

ENT & Otolaryngology Medical Billing Services

ENT billing combines office endoscopy, audiology, allergy testing and immunotherapy, and surgical procedures — four distinct billing models in one practice. Audiology and allergy services carry particularly restrictive coverage rules that differ sharply between Medicare and commercial plans.

ENT & Otolaryngology benchmarks

Typical denial rate
11–17%
Days in AR
34–46
Achievable clean claim rate
96%+

Typical ranges for ENT practices. Your actual numbers are measured during the audit.

The complexity

Why ent & otolaryngology is uniquely difficult to bill

Nasal endoscopy bundles with sinus procedures performed in the same session

Audiology coverage depends on whether testing is diagnostic or for hearing aid fitting

Allergy immunotherapy separates antigen preparation from injection administration

Allergy testing is billed per test unit with payer caps on quantity

Balloon sinuplasty requires prior authorization and documented failed medical therapy

Tonsillectomy and similar procedures carry global periods

Coding

ENT & Otolaryngology procedure codes we work with daily

A representative sample, not an exhaustive list. Coders are assigned by specialty rather than pooled.

CodeDescription
31231Nasal endoscopy, diagnostic, unilateral or bilateral
69210Removal of impacted cerumen requiring instrumentation, unilateral
92557Comprehensive audiometry threshold evaluation and speech recognition
95165Professional services for antigen preparation, per dose
42820Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy, younger than age 12
31237Nasal or sinus endoscopy with biopsy, polypectomy or debridement

Revenue leakage

Where ent & otolaryngology practices lose money

These are the denial patterns specific to this specialty — the ones a general-purpose billing service will not be looking for.

Endoscopy bundling

Diagnostic nasal endoscopy billed alongside a therapeutic sinus procedure performed in the same session.

Audiology purpose exclusion

Hearing testing denied by Medicare where it was performed for hearing aid fitting rather than medical diagnosis.

Antigen dose units

Immunotherapy antigen preparation billed by vial rather than by the number of doses prepared.

Allergy test quantity caps

Testing denied where the number of tests exceeds the payer's covered maximum per session.

Cerumen removal requirements

Cerumen removal billed where documentation does not establish impaction requiring instrumentation.

Payer landscape

What ENT practices need to know about payers

Payer policy drives more ent & otolaryngology denials than coding does. Knowing the policy before the service is what prevents them.

  • Medicare covers diagnostic audiology when ordered to evaluate a medical condition, but not testing performed for hearing aid fitting.
  • Antigen preparation is billed per dose prepared, which is a frequent source of both under- and over-billing.
  • Balloon sinuplasty typically requires prior authorization plus documented failure of medical management.

Questions

ENT & Otolaryngology billing FAQ

Last updated August 20, 2026

Reviewed by a certified coding lead

When it is performed as a distinct diagnostic service, not as the access route for a therapeutic procedure in the same session. If a polypectomy or debridement is performed endoscopically, the diagnostic endoscopy is bundled into it. A separately scheduled diagnostic endoscopy at a different encounter is billable.

It covers diagnostic audiology ordered to evaluate a medical condition such as sudden hearing loss, vertigo or tinnitus. It does not cover testing performed to select or fit a hearing aid, even when the same test is performed. The ordering purpose documented in the record determines coverage.

Antigen preparation and injection administration are separate services. Preparation is billed per dose prepared from the vial, not per vial — so a multi-dose vial supports multiple units. Miscounting here is one of the most common ENT billing errors in either direction.

The record must establish that the cerumen was impacted and that removal required instrumentation, a microscope or irrigation performed by the physician. Simple lavage by staff does not support the code. Documenting the impaction and the method used is what makes the claim defensible.

Primary sources

Coverage, rates and local policy for ent & otolaryngology, at the source.

Get a free ent & otolaryngology billing audit

We'll review your ent & otolaryngology denial patterns, coding accuracy and AR aging against the benchmarks above. Takes about two minutes to request.

No setup fees · You pay when we collect · Pricing from 3% of net collections