Skip to content
Timely filingCARCNot billable to patient

CO-29 denial code

The time limit for filing has expired

The claim was submitted after the payer's filing deadline, typically 90 to 365 days from date of service.

How to fix it

Appeal only if you can document timely original submission — a clearinghouse acceptance report is the strongest evidence. Otherwise the revenue is lost.

How to prevent it

Work AR by filing deadline proximity, not just by balance. This denial is permanent and entirely preventable.

The CO prefix marks this a contractual obligation. The balance is absorbed by the provider under the payer agreement and cannot be transferred to the patient.

In practice

A claim for a service performed fourteen months earlier is submitted after being discovered in an unworked queue. It returns CO-29 — the filing deadline has expired. The payer's limit was twelve months from the date of service.

There is no clinical or coding defect. The service was provided, documented and correctly coded. The revenue is lost because of elapsed time alone.

The only appeal that succeeds is one demonstrating the claim was originally filed within the deadline. A clearinghouse acceptance report showing the original submission date is the strongest evidence available; a note in the practice management system that someone believes it was sent is not.

What sits behind it

Timely filing is the most permanent denial category in revenue cycle management. Almost every other denial has a path to payment through correction or appeal. This one generally does not, which makes prevention the only meaningful control.

Deadlines vary widely — commonly ninety days to a year from the date of service, and shorter for some commercial plans and some secondary filings. They also run from different starting points depending on payer and claim type, which is why a single internal deadline applied to all payers reliably misses some.

The operational implication is that accounts receivable should be worked by proximity to filing deadline, not only by balance. A large claim with six months remaining is less urgent than a small one with three weeks, and a queue sorted by dollar value inverts that priority.

Related codes

Terms used here — Timely Filing · Days in AR · Appeal

How we handle it — AR Management · Claims Management · Denial Management

Primary sources

The rules behind CO-29, at the bodies that publish them.

Every denial code with a guide

Liability and workers comp

Timely filing

  • CO-29Timely Filing Limit Expired

Looking for a different code? Search all 190 CARC and RARC codes

Questions about CO-29

Only with proof of timely original submission. A clearinghouse acceptance report showing the original date is the strongest evidence. Without documentary proof the claim reached the payer inside the window, the revenue is lost.

Commonly ninety days to a year from the date of service, varying by payer, plan and claim type. Secondary claims often run from the primary payer's remittance date rather than the service date. Applying one internal deadline across all payers reliably misses the shorter ones.

No. The CO prefix makes it a contractual obligation, and the failure was administrative rather than the patient's. Billing it to the patient generally breaches the payer agreement.

Work accounts receivable by filing deadline proximity rather than by balance, and load each payer's actual deadline rather than a single internal default. This denial is entirely preventable and entirely permanent, which is an unusual and costly combination.

Find out what your denials are costing you

A free billing audit reviews your denial rate, AR aging and clean claim rate against industry benchmarks. Takes about two minutes to request. No sales pitch.

No setup fees · You pay when we collect · Pricing from 3% of net collections