Skip to content
ContractualCARCNot billable to patient

CO-223 denial code

Adjustment for mandated federal, state or local law

A regulatory adjustment applied.

How to fix it

Confirm the adjustment is correct. Generally not appealable.

How to prevent it

Understand which regulatory adjustments apply to your payer mix so they are expected rather than investigated.

The CO prefix marks this a contractual obligation. The balance is absorbed by the provider under the payer agreement and cannot be transferred to the patient.

In practice

A remittance carries a percentage reduction applied under a statutory requirement rather than the contract. The adjustment appears as CO-223 and no appeal route is offered.

Regulatory adjustments are applied by mandate and are generally not appealable, because the payer is complying with a requirement rather than exercising judgement.

Confirm the adjustment matches what the applicable rule requires and post it. The useful work is understanding which mandated adjustments apply to your payer mix so they are expected rather than investigated each time.

What sits behind it

The adjustments in this category vary and change with legislation. Sequestration reductions, state-mandated fee schedule adjustments and various statutory rate modifications have all appeared under this code, and each has its own basis and duration.

Because these are systematic rather than claim-specific, they are best modelled rather than worked. A practice that knows a fixed percentage reduction applies to a payer can build it into expected reimbursement, which turns a recurring surprise into a planning input.

The one thing worth checking is that the adjustment matches the mandate. A payer applying a larger reduction than the rule requires is not making a mandated adjustment, and that difference only becomes visible where the expected figure is known.

Related codes

Terms used here — Contractual Adjustment · Allowed Amount · Payment Posting

How we handle it — Revenue Cycle Management · Practice Analytics · AR Management

Primary sources

The rules behind CO-223, at the bodies that publish them.

Looking for a different code? Search all 190 CARC and RARC codes

Questions about CO-223

Generally not, because the payer is applying a legal requirement rather than making a determination. What can be checked is whether the amount matches what the mandate actually requires, and a larger reduction than the rule specifies is worth raising.

Sequestration reductions, state-mandated fee schedule adjustments and various statutory rate modifications, each with its own basis and duration. The specific mix depends on payer type and jurisdiction, and it changes as legislation does.

No — they are systematic and predictable, so they belong in expected reimbursement modelling rather than in a denial queue. Knowing a fixed reduction applies to a payer turns a recurring surprise into a planning figure.

Find out what your denials are costing you

A free billing audit reviews your denial rate, AR aging and clean claim rate against industry benchmarks. Takes about two minutes to request. No sales pitch.

No setup fees · You pay when we collect · Pricing from 3% of net collections