Comparison

AdvancedMD RCM vs an Outsourced Billing Service

Should revenue cycle come bundled with the practice management suite or be bought separately?

Short answer

Suite vendors such as AdvancedMD sell practice management, EHR and revenue cycle as parts of one product family, so billing is typically procured alongside the software. An independent billing service is bought separately and measured separately — which means it can be replaced on its performance alone, without touching the systems your clinicians use. Ask any suite vendor whether RCM can be contracted independently; where it can, much of the difference below narrows.

Bundling is a real convenience and it is worth naming honestly: one contract, one implementation, one support number, and no argument between vendors about whose problem a given failure is.

The cost of bundling is separability. When billing and software are the same purchase, underperforming billing is expensive to fix, because fixing it means unpicking the software too. That cost is invisible on day one and becomes the whole story in year three.

So the question is not which vendor is better. It is whether you want billing performance to be a decision you can revisit cheaply.

Side by side

Bundled suite RCM vs Independent billing service

A comparison of Bundled suite RCM and Independent billing service across 10 dimensions.
Dimension	Bundled suite RCM	Independent billing service
Procurement	Typically one contract covering software and service; confirm whether they can be separated	Separate from your software contract
Accountability when collections underperform	Same vendor supplies the tool and the service	Isolated — the service is measurable on its own
Cost of replacing the biller	Higher where the service is contracted with the software	Notice period; clinical systems untouched
Implementation	One project, but a larger one	Billing only — clinical workflow unchanged
Support model	Single vendor, single escalation path	Two vendors, two escalation paths
Pricing	Subscription plus RCM fees; confirm current terms directly	Percentage of net collections, 3–6% at Vizora
Specialty coding depth	Available; depth varies by specialty	Specialty-assigned certified coders
Aged AR recovery	Confirm whether backlog is in scope	Confirm whether backlog is scoped separately
Reporting	Native to the suite	Provided by the service; verify depth before signing
Best-fit practice	Practices buying software and billing at the same time	Practices whose software is settled and collections are not

Choose the bundled suite when

You are replacing practice management software anyway and want one project rather than two.
Administrative capacity is your constraint and reducing vendor count genuinely helps.
You want one escalation path when something breaks, and will trade separability for it.
Native reporting across scheduling, charting and billing matters to how you run the practice.

Choose an independent billing service when

Your practice management system is working and you do not want to replace it to fix collections.
You want billing measured on its own numbers — first-pass denial rate, days in AR, appeal rate — and replaceable on them.
Your specialty coding is genuinely difficult and depth matters more than breadth.
You have an aged AR backlog that needs dedicated attention now, not after an implementation.

When this is not the right answer

If you are buying practice management software regardless, bundling RCM with it is a reasonable decision and we are not a substitute for the software half — we do not sell one. Our argument only applies once your systems are settled. A practice mid-way through choosing an EHR should finish that decision first.

Questions

Generally yes — independent billers work inside most practice management systems given appropriate user access and an executed Business Associate Agreement. Confirm the specific access level required and whether your software contract places any restriction on third-party billing. Ask both vendors directly rather than assuming either answer.

Rate is the wrong comparison. What determines cost is net collection rate, and a two-point difference on $2 million in charges is $40,000 — larger than most differences in billing rate. Compare on first-pass denial rate, days in AR and appeal rate, and require those figures before comparing percentages.

Last reviewed August 20, 2026

Keep reading

Billing software vs billing service In-house vs outsourced billing Pricing In-House vs Outsourced Medical Billing Medical Billing vs Medical Coding Percentage of Collections vs Flat Fee Billing

Find out what your denials are costing you

A free billing audit reviews your denial rate, AR aging and clean claim rate against industry benchmarks. Takes about two minutes to request. No sales pitch.

Get your free billing audit Estimate your revenue leak

No setup fees · You pay when we collect · Pricing from 3% of net collections